Low-consumption techniques in tropical climates for energy and water savings in buildings: A review on experimental studies
Main Article Content
Published: Jul 20, 2022
Abstract
Different investigations have been developed over the years, and experimental research takes time to collect the information. Considering this, the objective of this research is to carry out a literature review of the strategies adopted by countries with tropical climates to achieve energy and water efficiency, as well as the comfort of the occupants to evaluate the performance of these techniques for each tropical climate type (i.e., tropical rainforest, tropical monsoon, tropical savanna, and subtropical). A methodology is presented using keywords and exclusion criteria for the best selection of articles. Time is saved by searching for information on low consumption strategies, types of buildings, and techniques implemented in each country. A summary of each experimental investigation is made. Results showed that it is possible to apply different techniques to the same type of building and have the savings of interest (water, energy, or comfort) without limiting it to a specific technique. Some tropical climates tend to use only one type of savings, such as comfort and others use energy and water. The experimental studies presented a relevant saving for passive design strategies in the following order: 1- 62.22% applying natural ventilation, water wall and stack flue, 2- 41% and 43% applying daylighting and glazing. 3- 35% applying wall insulation. For low consumption techniques: 1-14.31% and a 32.30% Remote Control extension device and 2-19% applying semitransparent photovoltaic glazing. This article is a resource that can be used by anyone interested in experimental studies in tropical climates.
Downloads
Article Details
References
(2) P. Torcellini, S. Pless, M. Deru, and D. Crawley, “Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition,” ACEEE Summer Study Pacific Grove, p. 15, 2006.
(3) W. Feng et al., “A review of net zero energy buildings in hot and humid climates: Experience learned from 34 case study buildings,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 114, p. 109303, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109303.
(4) A. Lenoir, G. Baird, and F. Garde, “Post-occupancy evaluation and experimental feedback of a net zero-energy building in a tropical climate,” Archit. Sci. Rev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 156–168, 2012, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2012.702449.
(5) S. N. Al-Saadi and A. K. Shaaban, “Zero energy building (ZEB) in a cooling dominated climate of Oman: Design and energy performance analysis,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 112, no. February, pp. 299–316, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.049.
(6) S. H. Lek and Z. Min, “Energy efficiency for tropical campus,” ASHRAE J., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 48–53, 2006.
(7) M. Doctor-Pingel, H. Lavocat, and N. Bhavaraju, “Performance of naturally ventilated buildings in a warm-humid climate: a case study of Golconde Dormitories, South India,” Archit. Sci. Rev., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2017.1300133.
(8) L. Moosavi, N. Mahyuddin, and N. Ghafar, “Atrium cooling performance in a low energy office building in the Tropics, a field study,” Build. Environ., vol. 94, no. P1, pp. 384–394, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.020.
(9) X. Sun, Z. Gou, and S. S. Y. Lau, “Cost-effectiveness of active and passive design strategies for existing building retrofits in tropical climate: Case study of a zero energy building,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 183, pp. 35–45, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.137.
(10) M. Abrahams and I. Ayoola, “Assessing residential building energy efficiency in the Caribbean environment: A case study of Trinidad and Tobago,” West Indian J. Eng., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 31–42, 2019.
(11) J. Iwaro and A. Mwasha, “Effects of Using Coconut Fiber–Insulated Masonry Walls to Achieve Energy Efficiency and Thermal Comfort in Residential Dwellings,” J. Archit. Eng., vol. 25, no. 1, p. 04019001, 2019, doi: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000341.
(12) T. S. Mari, S. Kuppusamy, S. Gunasagaran, S. Srirangam, and F. L. Ang, “Natural Brise Soleil: The Effects of Vegetation Shading on Thermal Environment of Residential Buildings in Hot and Humid Tropics,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 0–7, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/268/1/012013.
(13) S. Yuliani, G. Hardiman, E. Setyowati, W. Setyaningsih, and Y. Winarto, “Thermal behaviour of concrete and corrugated zinc green roofs on low-rise housing in the humid tropics,” Archit. Sci. Rev., no. April, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2020.1751054.
(14) S. Charoenkit, S. Yiemwattana, N. Rachapradit, S. Laywisadkul, N. Navapan, and T. Changnawa, “Thermal performance of living walls in thailand,” Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. Archit. Civ. Eng., no. Ace, pp. 272–277, 2019, doi: 10.5176/2301-394X_ACE19.555.
(15) K. M. Al-Obaidi, M. Ismail, and A. M. Abdul Rahman, “Design and performance of a novel innovative roofing system for tropical landed houses,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 85, pp. 488–504, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.101.
(16) B. Joseph, B. Kichonge, and T. Pogrebnaya, “Semi-Transparent Building Integrated Photovoltaic Solar Glazing: Investigations of Electrical and Optical Performances for Window Applications in Tropical Region,” J. Energy, vol. 2019, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/6096481.
(17) G. H. Lim, M. B. Hirning, N. Keumala, and N. A. Ghafar, “Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia,” Energy Build., vol. 141, pp. 175–185, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.028.
(18) L. Wells, B. Rismanchi, and L. Aye, “A review of Net Zero Energy Buildings with reflections on the Australian context,” Energy Build., vol. 158, pp. 616–628, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.055.
(19) M. A. C. Munaaim, K. M. Al-Obaidi, and M. Azizul Abd Rahim, “Performance comparison of solar assisted and inverter air conditioning systems in Malaysia,” J. Des. Built Environ., vol. 17, pp. 53–61, 2017, doi: 10.22452/jdbe.sp2017no1.5.
(20) R. Control, E. Device, F. O. R. Reducing, A. I. R. Conditioner, and E. Consumption, “REMOTE CONTROL EXTENSION DEVICE FOR REDUCING AIR CONDITIONER ENERGY CONSUMPTION,” vol. 6, pp. 329–335, 2019.
(21) O. Alvarez, M. Sanjuan, F. Amaya, and A. Bula, “VAV System Operating in an Educational Building Under Tropical Conditions: Energy Analysis.” Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1115/ES2013-18146.
(22) T. S. Larsen et al., “Occupants Influence on the Energy Consumption of Danish Domestic Buildings,” p. 77, 2010.
(23) O. T. Masoso and L. J. Grobler, “The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use,” Energy Build., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 173–177, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.009.
(24) D. K. Ahadzie, R. Opoku, S. N. Opoku Ware, and H. Mensah, “Analysis of occupant behaviour in the use of air-conditioners in public buildings in developing countries: evidence from Ghana,” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., no. July, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-01-2020-0001.
(25) C. C. Ohueri, W. I. Enegbuma, and R. Kenley, “Energy efficiency practices for Malaysian green office building occupants,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 134–146, 2018, doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0091.
(26) A. Bonoli, E. Di Fusco, S. Zanni, I. Lauriola, V. Ciriello, and V. Di Federico, “Green smart technology for water (GST4Water): Life cycle analysis of urban water consumption,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.3390/w11020389.
(27) W. Miller and L. Buys, “Anatomy of a sub-tropical Positive Energy Home (PEH),” Sol. Energy, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 231–241, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.09.028.
(28) S. Babu, A. Lamano, and P. Pawar, “Sustainability assessment of a laboratory building: Case study of highest rated laboratory building in Singapore using Green Mark rating system,” Energy Procedia, vol. 122, no. September, pp. 751–756, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.391.
(29) M. Y. L. Chew, S. Conejos, and F. H. Bin Azril, “Design for maintainability of high-rise vertical green facades,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 453–467, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2018.1440716.

